Taking back the ship |
However, by the end of the story, it is clear that Delano's judge of character leaves a lot to be desired, and that he was fooled by the clever Negro. The deposition at the end of the story is evidence of the true malevolent, calculating nature of Babo's character. It serves as a stark contrast to the portrait painted by Delano. In it, Babo is revealed as "being the ringleader" of the mutiny against the captain and his men. The deposition also serves to expose the fatal flaw of the slave/master dichotomy; "none wore fetters, because the owner....told him they were all tractable." The master did not fulfill his full role as master - he gave his slaves some slack, some leeway, and did not fetter them as he should. By his own neglect of role, he led his slaves to neglect their proper rules as subordinate, and they rose up against their oppressors. The roles of slave and master were reversed, in what seems to be a natural progression of events from the onset of the voyage. Delano paints a picture of a Benito Cereno dependent on Babo to carry out every day tasks, but in reality, he was dependent on him for so much more, for the survival of him and his men.
No comments:
Post a Comment