Edgar Allen
Poe’s approach to showing the natural depravity of man takes on a different
tact than the Puritan approach to ideas of savagery because of a very basic
difference: while the Puritans view savagery as emanating from the wilderness
and the inhabitants therein, Poe’s view has that same savagery coming out of
the civilized world. His protagonists are always male, often upper- to
middle-class, happily married, well off, but with a kind of bottled resentment.
This same resentment is brought to the surface and erupts into violence. That
violence is often used against animals or women.
Poe
sees violence as being a natural aspect of man, but often the impetus for this
savage behavior is an animal of some kind. Even the titles of some of his
works, “The Raven,” “The Black Cat,” are named for animals that become central
to the narrative. In “The Raven,” the narrator describes the bird appearing to
him on a windowsill: “In there stepped a stately raven of the saintly days of
yore.” When confronted with nature, the narrator is initially taken with it.
The raven is “stately” and tied to “days of yore.” This is clearly an important
bird. At the same time, much like the cat in “The Black Cat,” the raven is an
ill omen. While black cats are known as symbols of bad luck in general, the
raven is specifically linked to death.
The other major theme in both works is
that the reasons these encounters with a non-human element bring out such
negative response is never explained. The narrator in “The Black Cat” sums the
situation up best: “This
dread was not exactly a dread of physical evil - and yet I should be at a loss
how otherwise to define it.” This is a man who wants to hurt things and he does
not know why. The
shift in emotions is inexplicable even to the person experiencing it. And he
does not even limit himself to a singular social ill: the character progresses
from abusive to a drunkard to finally being a murderer. “Ligeia” has a narrator
who becomes an opium addict who hates his second wife, a hatred described as “belonging more to demon than to man.” The
case could be made that the savagery expressed in these stories is
pre-cultural, possibly even pre-human, but that falls apart to because there
are no instances of female characters in these stories taking on a darker
outlook, though that might have more to do with Poe’s issues with women. The
great difference between the Puritans and Poe is that Poe acknowledges an
innate evil in man. The natural world can bring it out, but it is not a source
of evil.
Your analysis on Poe’s and Puritan’s view of human depravity is very refreshing and accurate. The Puritan’s viewed the wilderness as a place where evil lurks. I found Poe’s approach to be remarkable as he correctly interprets human depravity resulting from civilization. Yes, Poe uses animals brilliantly, but the animals are innocent and mere reflections of what humans think of themselves. The Puritans were very resistant to believing that civilization was capable of evil. Poe breaks through the religious barriers put up by the Puritans and looks into human nature through a Gothic lens. Poe goes through great lengths to show the dark reality in humans which the Puritans have denied. Yes, Poe uses men only to show human depravity and that is a great observation. Women and animals are portrayed more as subjects and the trigger mechanism for male fury. This shows that man is capable of evil and nature is the sponge that absorbs the obsessions of man’s evil.
ReplyDeleteYou need to cite specific texts and quotes. Otherwise, your blog is too vague.
ReplyDelete