The
way nature (i.e. external nature) and human nature (i.e. internal nature) are
presented in Poe differs in tone from the way they are presented by the
Puritanical writers we have read thus far. The Puritan view of physical nature
and the content of character (a.k.a. human nature) is that these natural states
of being should be suppressed/controlled. Poe illustrates how elements of
depravity are present in everyone and are all around us, much like Mary
Rowlandson felt contained by the vast walls of nature (associated with savagery
in Rowlandson’s eyes) all around her. However, the concept of pre-destination
seems to give Rowlandson a more optimistic tone than Poe seems to possess;
Poe’s work has a more nostalgic and hopeless mood. Poe laments the imperfectability
of humans while Rowlandson attempts to make herself more complete and to
withstand God’s tests (i.e. become more perfect) through the discipline of
faith and scripture. Rowlandson’s
fear and resistance of nature opposes Poe’s approach of nature involving the
sense of awe, the macabre, and blurring the line between nature and the
praeternatural.
The Black Cat gives us what is perhaps
the most violent human act of violence-and, thus, depravity-in the selections
we have read from Poe. Poe himself acknowledges the fantastical/ridiculous
nature of the work in the introductory paragraph. After gouging out his beloved
cat’s eye in a drunken rage, there is a point where the narrator could step
back, realize that was certainly a breach of the line of decency regarding pets
and their owners. The narrator, however, notes this point and seemingly passes
right by it, developing this unprovoked hatred for the cat that loves him so
much. The narrator comments on his feelings about the gross deed in a very self-serving
manner:
“I
had so much of my old heart left, as to be at first grieved by this evident
dislike on the part of a creature which had once so loved me.” (Black Cat, p.2)
The
breaking point of humanity is also noted by the narrator himself:
“my
wife, who, as I have already said, possessed, in a high degree, the humanity of
feeling which had once been my distinguishing trait,” (Black Cat, p.4)
The unexpected
violence in the behavior of the owner of the black cat opposes unexpected
perpetrator of violence in The Murders in the Rue Morgue. In The Black Cat readers are familiar with
the man, and do not expect the violent outburst. Contrastingly, in The Murders
in the Rue Morgue, readers are familiar with the violent deed performed, and do
not know who the perpetrator is. The brutal nature of the crime itself leads
investigators to believe that the killer was a human deliberately carrying out
whatever act of revenge or robbery they had plotted. The violence of the crime,
leading investigators to believe it an intentional crime, caused police and
witnesses to overlook what seem like red flag clues in hindsight. If they
considered the strength required for the deed, and had no problem discerning
the two voices-one clearly French-why had the thought of an animal attack not
crossed their mind? Things escalated far enough for a completely innocent man
to be arrested for the crime with no evidence showing his guilt. Everyone
expected the perpetrator to be human, since the crime was so depraved in nature.
The brutality of the orangutan’s crime is what protected his identity until the
end of the story:
Departing
from the severity of The Black Cat and
The Murders on the Rue Morgue, we take a breath with the comparatively mild
poem The Raven. Mild in form and
method relative to the other works, The
Raven uses more subtle elements of horror such as a simple, mysterious rap
at the door that inspire:
“fantastic
terrors never felt before.” (The Raven,
p. 1)
This
comparatively quiet poem has a more haunting tone than the direct, excited
terror and wonder of The Black Cat or The Murders on the Rue Morgue. The
regal raven flies into a civilized space from the mysterious natural world
outside; nature’s messenger sent to distress the homeowner.
After taking a
calm breath with The Raven, Ligeia
gently steps from the quiet and mysterious out into the realm of the
fantastical and awesome. It is ironic that the narrator undercuts the story
with regular mentions of his addiction to opium. The mention of this addiction
and drug usage makes readers wonder whether the supernatural happenings are due
to actual supernatural activity or the effects of the drug. The addiction shows
the depravity/mental weakness of the narrator. Nature (the ethereal realm) took
Ligeia from the narrator, and desecrated Rowena’s body by allowing Ligeia to
return, transform, and occupy it:
“can
I never-can I never be mistaken-these are the full, and the black, and the wild
eyes-of my lost love-of the Lady- of the LADY LIGEIA.” (Ligeia, p.11)
Finally, we step
off of the mythical pedestal of Ligeia
and turn to The Masque of the Red Death.
A group of aristocrats attempts to cheat nature by quarantining themselves off
against a plague sweeping their community.
I found it interesting that you made a differentiation between Rowlandson's idea of predestination and Poe's. After reading your post, I realize now that it is important to note that, while the Puritans' and Poe had similar views on predestination and inevitable evil, Rowlandson had a more positive view of this phenomenon. Poe's view was likely that humans are inherently dark, corruptible creatures because it is in their nature to be so. Rowlandson, on the other hand, would believe in original sin. Therefore, to her the pain and suffering endured by humans is atonement for this original sin and, therefore, is a good thing.
ReplyDeleteInteresting comment. Poe's idea of Natural Depravity is interesting in that he always describes it in terms of bodily disintegration and madness while the Puritans see it in terms of the immortal soul. Does Poe believe in the soul or in art? as immortality?
ReplyDelete