The images of nature in
Washington Irving’s stories as well as in Cooper’s The Pioneers offer a new
perspective on the perception of wilderness following the Puritans. Mary
Rowlandson’s captivity narrative portrays the woods and its inhabitants as
savage creatures that represent the depraved nature of humans who have not been
enlightened to God’s principles. Her emotions towards the wilderness are ones of fear, pain, and
disgust, and she describes her environment as “the vast and desolate
wilderness.” Rowlandson and the Puritans
viewed the wilderness as a manifestation of hell itself, and though some
elements of anxiety towards the wilderness can be found in Irving’s stories,
the atmosphere as he describes offers a fascinating mystical viewpoint.
Both
Irving’s protagonists venture into the wilderness with animal companions and
encounter supernatural or legendary beings during their passage through the
forests. In The Legend of Sleepy Hollow, the attitude towards the wilderness retains
some of the Puritan sentiments, “From the listless
repose of the place, this sequestered glen has long been known by the name of
Sleepy Hollow. Some say that the place was bewitched during the early days of
the Dutch settlement; others, that an old Indian chief, the wizard of his
tribe, held his powwows there before the country was discovered by Master
Hendrick Hudson.” The Amerindian curse mentioned evokes Rowlandson’s encounters
with her captors and echoes some of the fear that the Puritans harbored towards
the forest and its native inhabitants. Though Ichabod Crane himself seems
enchanted by the beauty and mystery of nature. “Around him nature wore that
rich and golden livery which we always associate with the idea of abundance.” Here, it becomes clear that the cultural notions
surrounding the wilderness have changed in a positive way.
Irving’s other
protagonist, Rip Van Winkle, sees the forest as an escape from the wrath of his
wife, and he enjoys venturing into the depths of the Catskills,
described as “fairy mountains.” “Poor Rip was at last reduced almost to
despair; and his only alternative, to escape from the labor of the farm and
clamor of his wife, was to take gun in hand and stroll away into the woods.” In both stories, nature is seen as powerful
though shrouded in mystery.
Rip Van Winkle and Ichabod
Crane do not leave the forest unscathed, rather they encounter frightening and
unknown beings within the wilderness that significantly alter their lives, similar
to Rowlandson’s encounter with the Amerindians. Rowlandson’s journey through
the woods led her metaphorically towards God, while Crane, trying to evade the
headless horseman, gallops towards the safety of the church. “An opening in the trees now cheered him with the hopes that
the church bridge was at hand. He saw the whitewashed walls of the church dimly
glaring under the trees beyond…’If I can but reach that bridge,’ thought
Ichabod, ‘I am safe.’”
The fates of
both Ichabod Crane and Rip Van Winkle demonstrate that a cautiousness towards
the wilderness is still engrained in the psyche, though the stories myth-like
tone add curiosity and allure to the forest. Though the mentality has moved
away from the Puritans condemnation of the wilderness and its inhabitants,
Irving’s stories still contain a lingering sense of danger that shrouds the
wilderness in mystery.
I think you’re right to highlight both Cooper and Irving’s focus on the otherworldly aspects of the American wilderness. Certainly Rowlandson incorporates the super natural (i.e. God and the Devil) into her understanding of nature, but these later authors have a different understanding. Rip Van Winkle’s encounter with the old-style, nine-pin playing, liquor drinking Dutchmen has a spooky feel that gives the story an added level of intrigue. As for “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow,” the mysteriousness goes almost without saying. The point you make that “cautiousness towards the wilderness is still engrained in the psyche,” is an important aspect of the new American attitude toward the wilderness. It’s easy to focus entirely on the love of nature as a contrast to Rowlandson’s distaste for it, and I’m glad you brought up the other side of things. Much like the sublime in romantic landscapes of the 1800s, these authors seem to have a sort of awesome fear of the wilderness, along with their matter-of-fact American desire to wander freely through the woods.
ReplyDelete