Next, Winthrop discusses how God keeps things equal while
men are so inherently corrupt. “…That He might have the more occasion to
manifest the work of his Spirit: first upon the wicked in moderating and
restraining them, so that the rich and mighty should not eat up the poor, nor
the poor and despised rise up against and shake off their yoke.” These “works
of his Spirit” are essentially the rules and regulations that God imparts on
humans to save them from themselves. Also concerning the Covenant of Works,
Winthrop writes, “When God gives a special commission He looks to have it
strictly observed in every article.” This means that God gives us the ability
to make our own choices, but in making our own choices we must follow these “articles”
or rules made by God. Winthrop writes, “Thus stands the cause between God and
us. We are entered into a covenant with Him for this work…He ratified this covenant
and sealed our commission, and will expect a strict performance of the articles
contained in it; but if we shall neglect the observation of these articles
which are the ends we have propounded, and dissembling with our God, shall fall
to embrace this present world and prosecute our carnal intentions, seeking
great things for ourselves and our posterity, the Lord will surely break out in
wrath against us, and be revenged of such a people, and make us know the price
of the breach of such a covenant.” Basically, in this passage Winthrop is explaining
the consequences of breaking the laws that God put in place to protect human
kind. These passages that describe the reasons behind the Covenant of Gace and
the Covenant of Works are very telling of the Puritans’ relationship with their
higher power, who seems to be wrathful, ironfisted, but also loving.
Anne Bradstreet’s work “By Night when Others Soundly Slept”
is similar to “A Model of Christian Charity” in that it addresses both the
Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace, but portrays a wholly loving God.
Also, this work does not directly address as much into the Covenant of Grace as
Winthrop’s does, and does not mention outright that not all are destined for a
life of ease or welcomed into heaven. Bradstreet writes, “What to my Saviour
shall I give/ Who freely hath done this for me?/ I'll serve him here whilst I
shall live/ And Loue him to Eternity.” While pondering how to repay God for his
salvation, the narrator explains that she is going to serve God, and plausibly
follow his law.
For this week's post, I think we can all agree that identifying explicit references to the Covenant of Grace was far more challenging than making reference to the Covenant of Works. The Covenant of Works speaks directly to the religious ideology of the Puritans-- a strict, God-before-everything mentality. In Winthrop's "A Model of Christian Charity," time and time again, he describes in, at times, exhaustive detail the many components of the Covenant of Works and how to maintain this covenant. However, I found that the Covenant of Grace is, by far, a more personal and reflective covenant with God. In both Winthrop's and Bradstreet's works, I believe extracting parallels to Covenant of Grace requires the reader to have an intimate relationship with God. The Covenant of Grace and the Covenant of Works, though both individually important to one's faith, are equally important to strengthening each person's communion with God. As Puritan writers addressing their community, it is interesting to me that Bradstreet and Winthrop challenge their fellow Puritan believers. When reading these works, one questions their own faith and relationship with God-- that is the Puritan way. After reflecting on these works, it becomes clear to me that Bradstreet and Winthrop truly believed they were God's messengers, laying the foundation for that "city on a Hill."
ReplyDelete